This is Not a Done Deal!

   

 

C4C's Rebuttals to Lynwood's FAQ

Click here to download a ready-to-print copy of this information.  Please feel free to distribute to family, friends, and neighbors.

Click here to go to C4C's Rebuttal to Lynwood's FAQ Sheet - Casinos and Sovereignty

 
 

C4C's Rebuttal to Lynwood's Casinos and Economic Development FAQ

   
   

 (With Sources for Information Underlined)

 DID YOU KNOW? 

Did you know, of all of the surrounding communities, Lynwood: 

            -has the lowest unemployment rate           

            -has the highest median household income 

            -has the highest median family income 

            -has the highest median house value 

-has the lowest percentage of families and individuals below the poverty level  (United States  Census Bureau) 

Our Lynwood Mayor and his trustees would have all of us believe that the Village of Lynwood is in such a poor financial state that it is one step away from being bankrupt and unable to function.  The truth is that Lynwood is a bedroom community, with the majority of its residents having good jobs outside of the community, and whose residents would not benefit whatsoever from any jobs that might come from a casino.  What this area needs for true economic growth is better road infrastructure, an Illinois-Indiana expressway south of I-80, and a rail line to the city, among other improvements.  Until we get those things, true economic development cannot occur.  Any attempt to locate a casino here is misguided and shortsighted and is not what this area needs for true economic development.  We, as residents of this community, need to encourage our Mayor and the Village Board to rethink their stand and encourage them to embrace transportation improvements that would truly benefit Lynwood.


GAMING INDUSTRY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 

Despite the overwhelming body of research that has documented the disadvantages of casinos and the havoc they have wreaked on the communities where they are located, gambling proponents continue to make baseless claims about their benefits.  When responding to a question and quoting a reference, one must consider the source and understand the context in which it was written.  In reference to the federally funded gambling impact study, one should read the whole document, its sources, and its recommendations before using it as a reference. 

1.  What is the best type of gaming package for a community? 

There is no best type of gaming package for a community relative to the community.  The National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC) has recommended that there be a moratorium on all gambling expansion. 

2.  Where is the best place to locate such a resort? 

As shown by the United States Census Bureau, Lynwood does not have high levels of unemployment or underemployment and therefore would not benefit from the jobs this casino would provide.   

3.  What are the economic impacts of casino gaming?

The introduction of casino gaming may create some low paying jobs, for example, the average tribal casino pays its employees an average annual salary of $17,835 per year.  The Ho-Chunk Nation’s own average is $18,872 per year. 

As far as the two sources quoted by the Village of Lynwood, The National Opinion Research Center (NORC) was found to be biased and non-accurate by the National Gambling Impact Study Commission.  Moreover, the study done by PricewaterhouseCoopers ought not be considered since they are biased to the gaming industry.  Their own mission statement is “the professionals of PricewaterhouseCoopers Hospitality and Leisure practice have a long-term commitment to the gaming industry.  Our team of specialists have experience in providing the vast range of services required to support a successful gaming development initiative”.  Any report from them is certainly biased since they will not and cannot “bite the hand that feeds them.”   

Dr. John Warren Kindt, an economist from the University of Illinois, has studied the economic impacts of gambling and has noted, “Traditional business are at a competitive disadvantage when pitted against legalized gambling interests (The Economic Impacts of Legalized Gambling Activities).  Furthermore,  “Areas that develop successfully through casinos, shrink the economies of neighboring areas, while sending many of the social costs home with the problem gamblers (Id).

 4.  What are the statistics on casino employment opportunities?

 While it is true that casinos do employ people, the jobs created destroy an equal number of jobs elsewhere, thus “creating” no new jobs (Chicago Metro Ethics Coalition).  The average non-tribal casino wage is $20,589, while the average tribal casino wage is $17,835. 

5.  Do other businesses suffer when casinos are introduced into a community?

 Dr. John Warren Kindt has found that “casinos compete too well in a capitalistic society.  Land values are inflated by speculation; skyrocketing real estate taxes overwhelm local residents who do not sell out to speculators; and existing institutions and recreation facilities cannot match the attraction and economic clout of the casinos.”  His research has led him to conclude that, “traditional businesses resent that they must compete with the gambling interests not just for the so-called ‘entertainment dollar’ or ‘recreational dollar’ but for other consumer dollars as well.  Generally, traditional businesses were slow to recognize the way in which legalized gambling organizations captured dollars from across the entire spectrum of the various consumer markets.” (The Economic Impacts of Legalized Gambling). Based on this research, clearly local businesses, especially if the casino complex offers the same type of businesses, will suffer if they survive or will close up completely. 

 6.  Do mobsters and organized crime control the casino industry?

 One cannot conclude conclusively from the NGISC if mobsters and organized crime do or do not control the gambling industry today. 

 7.  Is there an increase in crime near casinos?

 All of the evidence, with the exception of that which is done by the gambling industry themselves, show that, without doubt, crime does go up in and around a community that has a casino.  From the standpoint of pure numbers, to have a casino this large and to attract the amount of visitors that they would like to attract each day, the law of averages states that there would be an increase in crime due to the increase in people.  To say there is no increase in crime is blind and shortsighted.  Even Sauk County, Wisconsin’s Sheriff, when asked if there was an increase in crime since the arrival of the Ho-Chunk Casino near Baraboo, Wisconsin, stated that there was an increase in crime since its arrival.  From The Economic Impacts of Legalized Gambling Activities, Dr. John Warren Kindt states, “Shortly after the advent of legalized casino gambling [Nov. 1989], the Deadwood[South Dakota] casino economy lurched forward.  The state’s attorney’s office in Deadwood indicated that within approximately two years: 

1.       Child abuse cases had increased 42-43% (from 350 to 500 cases);

2.       Police costs had increased 80%-100% with a virtual doubling of the number of police officers;

3.       Although national statistics had increased only slightly, crime in the Deadwood area had increased overall by 10% (although prior to 1989 the crime rate had been declining) with a 50% increase in felonies.  Furthermore, there were 614 Class one misdemeanors or felonies in 1988, and 1070 in 1992, a 75% increase in four years;

4.       Domestic violence and assaults had risen 80%; and

5.       Burglaries and writing of bad checks had increased, while illegal drug, prostitution, and drunk driving cases had remained relatively the same. 

 8.  Do communities with casinos experience unique or elevated levels of social problems?

  In his research Gambling as Economic Policy: Enumerating Why Losses Exceed Gains, Dr. Earl L. Grinols states that “Nevada, for example, has the highest suicide rate for residents for the nation—its rate is more that double the national average.  It has the highest high school drop-out rate; is first for deaths per vehicle-mile driven; and, according to the January 1994 issue of the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, it led the nation in child death by abuse in 1979-1988 (a period when casino gambling was illegal in other parts of the nation except Atlantic City).”

 9.  If casinos open in a community, will there be an increase in the number of pathological gamblers?

 The answer is an unequivocal YES!  Dr Earl L. Grinols states that the number of problem economic gamblers is approximately 10% of the population, even in those states that only have state lotteries (Gambling as Economic Policy: Enumerating Why Losses Exceed Gains).   Dr. John Warren Kindt in The Economic Impacts of Legalized Gambling Activities,  states that the “ proximity to gambling influences the extent to which people engage in that activity.  By exposing potential gamblers to legal casino gambling, a number of these individuals will experience problem gambling behaviors which may have otherwise remained dormant.”   

10. Do bankruptcy rates increase when casinos are introduced into a community?

YES!  From the Institute for Problem Gambling,  “A third of all people who seek treatment for problem gambling in Connecticut have either already filed for bankruptcy, or are in the process of filing, as they enter treatment,” explains Health Center psychologist Nancy Petry, Ph.D., principal investigator of the nation’s first controlled study on treatments for compulsive gamblers.  “These rates are nearly eight times higher than in the general population,” she added.  According to The Christian Science Monitor March 19, 2004,  “A controversial new study has found that personal bankruptcy rates are twice as high in counties with gambling casinos than in those without.”

 We would ask that our Mayor of Lynwood and the board individually do their homework and research this all for themselves.  The overwhelming evidence shows that a casino would be a BAD DEAL for this community and we need our Mayor and his board to see that a short-term, short-sighted “economic” plan for this community would not be beneficial in the long term.  Long term economic development is going to take time and infrastructure changes.  We need to be patient and put the interests of this community first, then true economic development can and will take place, to benefit not only the village of Lynwood and its residents, but also the entire Southland. 

Click here to download a ready-to-print copy of the above information.  Please feel free to distribute to family, friends, and neighbors.

 

 

   
     
       
 
 
  Citizens for Our Community, Inc.
  P.O. Box 542
  Lansing, IL  60438
  (708) 895-1180

 

CasiNO

© Copyright 2004 Citizens for Our Community, Inc.